RSM270 · Operations Management · Fall 2026
Week 1: Introduction & Overview
This week, you will map a coffee-shop service process, compare output and productivity in a candle example, and distinguish effectiveness from efficiency.
Map the coffee-shop process
A process is the work that turns inputs into outputs. Classify each part of a customer-service process.
The customer-service view
- Inputs Customer, ingredients, people, equipment
- Work Take the order and prepare the drink
- Outputs Prepared drink and served customer
Compare productivity—not only output
Compare two one-hour candle-production cases using the same worker rate and machine.
- Worker rate
- 20 candles per worker-hour
- Labor cost
- $10 per worker-hour
- Machine cost
- $20 per hour
- Labor productivity
- output ÷ worker-hours
- Multifactor productivity here
- output ÷ (labor cost + machine cost)
What changes—and what does not
- Hourly output
- 2 workers40 candles/hour
- 4 workers80 candles/hour
- Labor productivity
- 2 workers20 candles/worker-hour
- 4 workers20 candles/worker-hour
- Multifactor productivity
- 2 workers1 candle/dollar
- 4 workers4/3 candles/dollar ≈ 1.33 candles/dollar
Show every calculation
- Hourly output
- 2 workers × 20 candles/worker-hour = 40 candles/hour4 workers × 20 candles/worker-hour = 80 candles/hour
- Labor productivity
- 40 candles/hour ÷ 2 worker-hours/hour = 20 candles/worker-hour80 candles/hour ÷ 4 worker-hours/hour = 20 candles/worker-hour
- Multifactor productivity
- 40 candles/hour ÷ (2 worker-hours/hour × $10/worker-hour + $20/hour) = 1 candle/dollar80 candles/hour ÷ (4 worker-hours/hour × $10/worker-hour + $20/hour) = 4/3 candles/dollar ≈ 1.33 candles/dollar
The multifactor measure includes labor and machine cost only.
Managerial limit: this comparison does not justify scheduling four workers. First check demand, machine capacity, quality, and any other relevant costs; then recalculate if the values change.
Judge performance from two angles
Effective means the stated objective is achieved. Efficient means resources are used economically.
Two questions, four possibilities
| Resources used economically | Resources not used economically | |
|---|---|---|
| Objective achieved | Effective and efficient | This shopEffective but inefficient |
| Objective not achieved | Ineffective but efficient | Ineffective and inefficient |
Optional: audit a real operating change
Read how Starbucks changed the sequence of making a drink. Treat the company account as a source to examine, not as proof of the result.
Separate change, claim, evidence, and unknown
- Change
- Pull espresso before steaming milk, together with revised roles and digital support.
- Claim
- Save time without sacrificing quality; increase throughput and shorten waits.
- Evidence
- Descriptions of in-store trials and participant accounts, but no numerical baseline or comparison.
- Still needed
- A defined outcome measure, comparison, time period, and quality safeguard.