← Course contents

RSM270 · Operations Management · Fall 2026

Week 1: Introduction & Overview

This week, you will map a coffee-shop service process, compare output and productivity in a candle example, and distinguish effectiveness from efficiency.

A barista preparing a drink beside an espresso machine in a busy coffee shop
Look past the finished drink: materials, people, equipment, and the customer all shape the process. Photo: Madeline Liu / Unsplash.

Map the coffee-shop process

A process is the work that turns inputs into outputs. Classify each part of a customer-service process.

Where does each item belong?

Choose one category in every row.

Item Input Work Output
Coffee beans and milk
Baristas and equipment
Customer entering
Take order and prepare drink
Prepared coffee drink
Served customer

The customer-service view

  1. Inputs Customer, ingredients, people, equipment
  2. Work Take the order and prepare the drink
  3. Outputs Prepared drink and served customer
What this figure shows: a broad customer-service process runs from the entering customer and other resources to a prepared drink and a served customer. For a preparation-method decision, use a narrower process that begins with the ingredients and ends with the drink.

Compare productivity—not only output

Compare two one-hour candle-production cases using the same worker rate and machine.

Worker rate
20 candles per worker-hour
Labor cost
$10 per worker-hour
Machine cost
$20 per hour
Labor productivity
output ÷ worker-hours
Multifactor productivity here
output ÷ (labor cost + machine cost)
Move from two workers to four

Predict what happens before seeing the calculations.

What changes—and what does not

Hourly output
2 workers40 candles/hour
4 workers80 candles/hour
Labor productivity
2 workers20 candles/worker-hour
4 workers20 candles/worker-hour
Multifactor productivity
2 workers1 candle/dollar
4 workers4/3 candles/dollar ≈ 1.33 candles/dollar
What this figure shows: doubling the workforce doubles hourly output and raises the specified multifactor productivity, while labor productivity remains 20 candles/worker-hour. Compare bars only within a row because the rows use different units and scales.
Show every calculation
Hourly output
2 workers × 20 candles/worker-hour = 40 candles/hour4 workers × 20 candles/worker-hour = 80 candles/hour
Labor productivity
40 candles/hour ÷ 2 worker-hours/hour = 20 candles/worker-hour80 candles/hour ÷ 4 worker-hours/hour = 20 candles/worker-hour
Multifactor productivity
40 candles/hour ÷ (2 worker-hours/hour × $10/worker-hour + $20/hour) = 1 candle/dollar80 candles/hour ÷ (4 worker-hours/hour × $10/worker-hour + $20/hour) = 4/3 candles/dollar ≈ 1.33 candles/dollar

The multifactor measure includes labor and machine cost only.

Managerial limit: this comparison does not justify scheduling four workers. First check demand, machine capacity, quality, and any other relevant costs; then recalculate if the values change.

Judge performance from two angles

Effective means the stated objective is achieved. Efficient means resources are used economically.

A coffee-shop decision

Customers say the shop meets its high-quality drink objective. The same output and quality could be produced with a less costly machine, but the shop uses the more expensive one.

Which description fits?

Two questions, four possibilities

Resources used economicallyResources not used economically
Objective achievedEffective and efficientThis shopEffective but inefficient
Objective not achievedIneffective but efficientIneffective and inefficient
What this figure shows: the shop achieves its quality objective but uses a more costly resource than needed, so it is effective but inefficient.

Optional: audit a real operating change

Read how Starbucks changed the sequence of making a drink. Treat the company account as a source to examine, not as proof of the result.

Separate change, claim, evidence, and unknown
Change
Pull espresso before steaming milk, together with revised roles and digital support.
Claim
Save time without sacrificing quality; increase throughput and shorten waits.
Evidence
Descriptions of in-store trials and participant accounts, but no numerical baseline or comparison.
Still needed
A defined outcome measure, comparison, time period, and quality safeguard.

Apply it